
Mithun Architects entered this off-grid building into the Cascadia Region Green Building Council’s Living Building Challenge. It’s designed to be completely energy and water sufficient and includes greenhouses, rooftop gardens, a chicken farm, and fields for growing vegetables and grains.
A few months after leaving South Africa last year, and in the midst of the global food-price riots, I wrote a piece on Urban Agriculture and Food Security. It was mostly guess work at the time, but based on the amount of food I had seen being grown in Durban it seemed pretty clear that individual and community gardens provided a buffer zone between the most vulnerable residents and skyrocketing international food prices.
Now that I’m back in Durban for the next two months, more information on the theme has come my way at it seems like my guess wasn’t far off. Stephanie Nieuwoudt, at IPS, provides a portrait of the women running one particular project in the township of Philippi, just outside of Capetown.
More and more residents have been turning to local agriculture to find nourishment in the face of climbing prices. And the yields are impressive: a local official there explains that “a backyard garden four times the size of an ordinary door, can supply a household of six people with fresh vegetables for a year.” Properly maintained it can keep producing for year. The Philippi project and many other like it have been carried globally since 2005 as part of the Cities Farming for the Future Project.
Apart from the gardens themselves, the most interesting thing to have emerged from the first phase of the project is what has gotten in their way. People don’t take urban agriculture seriously. In many cities, both municipal officials and local farmers are in the dark about the role that local agriculture can play in supporting urban development. Urban agriculture has not played a big role in established models of urban development up to this point (it’s “Central Park” after all, not “Central Farm”). As a result it simply isn’t on the radar of key decisions makers and isn’t receiving the support it needs (service provision, credit, structures for land tenure, infrastructure and training).
Beyond food security (which is itself crucially important) urban food production can do a lot. It can promote the social inclusion of disadvantaged groups, reduce the amount of waste in municipal landfills (or streets), reduce urban heat island and to improve the overall urban micro-climates and help maintenance of buffer zones around urban areas. But only if city officials and residents learn to see agriculture for what it is. Not a remnant of the rural past that many new arrivals have left behind, but as a key part in the systems that will allow residents to create cities that are healthy and stable homes for even the most poor.
Look for more on urban food production in our upcoming March/April issue.




March 3rd, 2009 at 10:43 am
Christopher Hume wrote about urban farming in yesterday’s Toronto Star. There was an image of ‘Pig City’ – a dutch architectural firms vision of pork production that is built into vertical towers and designed in such a way as to minimize odors and waste, while maximizing meat output. With a few of these buildings in our industrial parks, Toronto could be ‘hogtown’ once again!
March 4th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
It just goes to show how ahead of the game ReNew Canada is – we even covered that project back in our November/December 2007 issue as part of our GTMA business mission series. Our editor, Mira Shenker, sat through an interesting presentation on urban food production in Holland, during which we heard all about Pig City.